no-conflicting-classes

oxlint rule that reports Tailwind CSS classes on one element whose CSS clashes, like p-2 p-4, comparing the declarations your design system emits.

At a glance

Autofix	Editor suggestions	Design system	Options
No	No	Required (entryPoint)	entryPoint, reportRedundant, allow

What this rule does

Detects pairs of Tailwind classes on the same element, under the same variant, whose CSS declarations clash — where one of the two is silently discarded. The comparison is made against the CSS the design system actually emits, values included: property names alone cannot tell a conflict from a composition.

A shared property is a conflict only when the declaration that LOSES the cascade carries something the winner does not reproduce. Which means these are not conflicts, and none of them is special-cased:

• the same value on both sides — mask-b-from-50% mask-b-from-black share four byte-identical declarations, so whoever wins, the result is the same;
• a var() forwarder and the class supplying the variable — outline-2 declares outline-style: var(--tw-outline-style) and carries no value of its own; matching is by the real variable name, so a plugin's --scrollbar-* behaves exactly like Tailwind's --tw-*;
• a winner that still pulls the loser in — drop-shadow-indigo-500 reads the --tw-drop-shadow-size that drop-shadow-xl writes, followed transitively (that is how the from-* / via-* / to-* chain composes);
• a custom property reset to initial — animate-in initializes every --tw-enter-* for its modifiers to override;
• declarations on different boxes — placeholder-* styles ::placeholder, space-x-* styles the children, neither styles the element.

Two classes that declare the same property with the same value are reported as redundant instead: not a conflict, but one of them is dead weight. reportRedundant: false opts out.

Which class wins is asked of the design system, not inferred from the order you wrote the classes in — Tailwind's output does not depend on that order. When the position cannot be known (for a class whose value you wrote, like w-[10px]), the diagnostic reports the clash without naming a winner.

Only two compositions cannot be derived from the CSS, and they stay declared in the source with the reason why: prose size variants and prose + max-w-* (the plugin intends the override and the emitted CSS is indistinguishable from an accident), and mask-composite modes. For a composition your own plugins produce, use the allow option rather than waiting for a release.

DS-dependent — requires settings.tailwindcss.entryPoint. When the design system can't load, the rule emits a single fatal designSystemUnavailable diagnostic per file instead of silently passing.

Options

Option	Type	Default	Description
reportRedundant	boolean	true	Report two classes that declare the same property with the same value as redundant.
allow	(string | [string, string])[]	[]	Patterns to silence, matched against the class as written (variant prefix and ! included). A bare pattern silences any pair involving a matching class; a two-element pattern silences that combination, in either order.
entryPoint	string	—	Per-rule override of settings.tailwindcss.entryPoint.

{
  "rules": {
    "tailwindcss/no-conflicting-classes": [
      "error",
      {
        // Your plugin composes in a way the emitted CSS cannot show.
        "allow": [["^gutter-thin$", "^gutter-(thumb|track)-"]],
      },
    ],
  },
}

Examples

✗ Incorrect

// Same property, different value: one of them is discarded
<div className="text-red-500 text-blue-500" />

// Conflict survives across variants when both classes share the same one
<div className="hover:bg-red-500 hover:bg-blue-500" />

// `!important` doesn't help — same property, still a conflict
<div className="!text-red-500 !text-blue-500" />

// Same gradient role conflicts (`from-` + `from-`); different roles compose
<div className="from-red-500 from-blue-500" />

// Asymmetric narrowing: wider class AFTER the narrower one clobbers it
<div className="h-6 size-4" />

✓ Correct

// Different properties
<div className="flex items-center" />

// Different variants — applied under different conditions
<div className="hover:bg-red-500 focus:bg-blue-500" />

// Gradient stops are complementary
<div className="from-blue-500 via-purple-500 to-pink-500" />

// `shadow-*` + `ring-*` compose via disjoint --tw-* custom properties
<div className="shadow-lg ring-1 ring-offset-2" />

Interactions with other rules

• no-duplicate-classes: complementary. Duplicates are the exact same class repeated; conflicts are different classes that hit the same property. Keep both rules on.
• enforce-sort-order: cosmetic for the plain CSS cascade — which class wins is decided by the generated stylesheet, not by attribute order, so sorting only makes the pair easier to read. The one exception is tailwind-merge: it resolves same-group classes by last occurrence in the string, so reordering a fragment can flip which one survives. That only bites two conflicting classes co-located in a single merge fragment — the anti-pattern this rule already flags — so fixing the conflict removes the sort hazard too. See that rule's own note.
• no-deprecated-classes: a deprecated alias and its modern equivalent (flex-grow + grow) will trip this rule on the property level. Fixing the deprecation usually resolves the conflict.
• enforce-canonical: rewriting to canonical forms collapses trivially-aliased pairs before they reach this rule.

When to disable it

• Generated class lists where the order is meaningful and you rely on "last wins" semantics intentionally (e.g. a base + override pattern in a design system primitive). Prefer extracting the override into a cn()/twMerge() call so the conflict becomes explicit.
• Codebases whose own plugins compose in a way the emitted CSS cannot show: use the allow option rather than disabling the rule. Patterns are matched against the class as written, so include the variant prefix if you need to silence hover: forms too.
• Tests / fixtures that intentionally build conflicting class strings to exercise other tooling.